Re: Need Help with Knoppix

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Patrick Fleming
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: Need Help with Knoppix
These are a little old, but I think they still work:

dpkg --get-selections > /backup/installed-software.log

dpkg --set-selections < /backup/installed-software.log

Once list is imported, use the dselect commmand or other tools to
install the packages, enter:
# dselect

Select 'i' to install the software.

From:
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-get-list-installed-software-reinstallation-restore.html

Maybe similar functionality using aptitude - I'm used to apt.


On 02/05/2014 01:28 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
> OK, I checked the hardware and there are two drives in the machine - one
> for boot and one with photos and other data. They are connected to a PCI
> controller card that had two channels. So, I tried switching the cable
> on the controller card to the second channel.
>
> After booting with knoppix, fdisk -l showed the two drives. I went for
> the gold and tried booting the system normally. It ran into some read
> errors from the boot drive when running a forced disk check, so it
> dropped down into maintenance mode and I ran fsck /dev/sda1. I let it
> correct the errors it found and then the machine booted up and is
> running. During the boot up fsck was forced to run again on the second
> drive, but no errors were found.
>
> One fatality from the fsck on the boot drive - backuppc dies because
> there were some bad nodes found in one of the perl modules.
>
> I think I need a new controller card and to reload some software. How
> would I tell aptitude to download and re-install what is currently on
> the system? My thinking is that will correct any issues caused by the
> bad nodes found on the boot drive. If I can get this drive back in good
> shape, it may be time for a new drive as well.
>
> Any other thoughts or ideas?
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Mark Phillips
> < <mailto:mark@phillipsmarketing.biz>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks. I will have to tear into the hardware tomorrow to see what I
>     find.

>
>     Mark

>
>
>     On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Michael Butash <
>     <mailto:michael@butash.net>> wrote:

>
>         I think it's pooped out... and it only sees one.

>
>             [    5.956680] ata3: link is slow to respond, please be
>             patient (ready=0)

>
>             [   10.970015] ata3: device not ready (errno=-16), forcing
>             hardreset
>             [   16.136680] ata3: link is slow to respond, please be
>             patient (ready=0)
>             [   20.990011] ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
>             [   26.156678] ata3: link is slow to respond, please be
>             patient (ready=0)
>             [   31.010012] ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
>             [   36.176675] ata3: link is slow to respond, please be
>             patient (ready=0)
>             [   66.043340] ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
>             [   71.050008] ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
>             [   71.061817] ata3: reset failed, giving up

>
>
>         This was a bit interesting though:

>
>         [    0.939779] ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma
>         0xffa0 irq 14

>
>         [    0.939783] ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma
>         0xffa8 irq 15
>         [    0.939875] ata1: port disabled--ignoring
>         [    0.943281] pata_sil680 0000:01:07.0: version 0.4.9
>         [    0.943325] sil680: 133MHz clock.
>         [    0.944316] scsi2 : pata_sil680
>         [    0.944507] scsi3 : pata_sil680
>         [    0.944666] ata3: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xecf8 ctl 0xecf0
>         bmdma 0xecc0 irq 16
>         [    0.944671] ata4: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xece0 ctl 0xecd8
>         bmdma 0xecc8 irq 16
>         [    0.945455] Error: Driver 'pata_platform' is already
>         registered, aborting...

>
>         It sees the one on ata3, and read your cdrom, but the drive is
>         stalling response, not sure that's not due to kernel oddities
>         though at the end of that.  Check the status of the drives in
>         the bios, it should usually register or show them in legacy bios
>         ata devices. Can try to play with the ata modes in the bios.

>
>         Maybe try changing the modes or jumpers, maybe they're both
>         master devices?  Mmm, master/slave jumpers, makes me feel old to
>         remember them on drives...

>
>         Try one at a time too to rule it out, or another controller.

>
>         -mb

>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss