Yeah, no doubt. He wouldn't stick up for his buddy? The guy he supports? Or
because of legal reasons?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnPI7B7ZS9M
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13151889
http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2013/01/24/what-mark-zuckerberg-and-chris-christie-have-in-common
its also [almost] word for word the same as Zuckerbergs.
https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10100828955847631[1]
on a similar note, its not far fetched that they would be legally required to deny
access, like an NSL...
I think 3rd party auditors would calm fears too.
Eric
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Stephen <
cryptworks@gmail.com[2]> wrote:
Another snip, this is actually an interesting response given out conversation
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/[3]
and thanks for the link on burnerphone. that is indeed interesting.
PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org[4]
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss[5]
--------
[1]
https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10100828955847631
[2]
mailto:cryptworks@gmail.com
[3]
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/
[4]
mailto:PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
[5]
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss 
(text/plain)