Re: reiserfs reliability

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Paul Mooring
Date:  
To: amit@amitnepal.com, Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: reiserfs reliability
I used to swear by it for file servers. One time I got some data corruption that couldn't be recovered (still not sure if it was reiserfs or mdadm to blame) but all the same I moved off of it for ext4 and sometimes xfs as work had mostly stopped on reiserfs anyhow. My recommendation would probably be unless you really need to squeeze a whole lot of performance out of a file system with a whole lot of small files, there's not really enough gains to give up the (admittedly slight) stability gains of ext4.
--
Paul Mooring
Systems Engineer and Customer Advocate

www.opscode.com

From: Amit Nepal <<mailto:amit@amitnepal.com>>
Reply-To: "<mailto:amit@amitnepal.com>" <<mailto:amit@amitnepal.com>>, Main PLUG discussion list <<mailto:plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org>>
Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 9:40 AM
To: "<mailto:plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org>" <<mailto:plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org>>
Subject: reiserfs reliability

I am thinking to use reiserfs in one of my storage server. I have not used reiserfs before and I am wondering how reliable it is. Any one have any experience with the reliability of reiserfs ? From what I can see, it seems to be good for faster access, but I wonder how the reliability is. Anyone used reiserfs before or have any experience with it ?

Thank you--
Amit K Nepal
Infrastructure Engineer (RHCE)
omNovia Technologies Inc.<http://www.omnovia.com>

<http://www.amitnepal.com>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss