Re: What is the most efficient way to convert a .wmv video?

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: kitepilot@kitepilot.com
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: What is the most efficient way to convert a .wmv video?
ffmpeg
ET

writes:

> What is the most efficient way to convert
> a .wmv video to a mpeg (or other format)
> that most systems/browsers can play?
>
> I have a 21-second video test.wmv -- size 641,131 here:
> - - - http://www.upquick.com/videos/test.wmv - - -
> Firefox apparently cannot play .wmv videos.
>
> So I used Openshot to convert it to test2.mpeg
> (with a resulting size of 6,981,632) here:
> - - - http://www.upquick.com/videos/test2.mpeg - - -
> Firefox plays this fine, but the file size is huge.
>
> Then I used Openshot again to convert it to test3.mpeg
> (with a resulting size of 3,254,272) here:
> - - - http://www.upquick.com/videos/test3.mpeg - - -
> Firefox plays this fine, with less than half the file size.
>
> All of the Openshot settings options shown at this link:
> - - - http://www.upquick.com/videos/openshot.jpg - - -
> are very confusing.
>
> Surely there must be a more efficient (command line)
> method to convert .wmv (and other) video files.
>
> Suggestions?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss