Re: new memory record for me

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: keith smith
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: new memory record for me

Ok,  Thank you.

So one CPU? and all that RAM? 

------------------------

Keith Smith

--- On Tue, 9/18/12, Matt Graham <> wrote:

From: Matt Graham <>
Subject: Re: new memory record for me
To: "Main PLUG discussion list" <>
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2012, 9:02 AM

From: keith smith <>
> I must admit I know little about computer architecture and OSes at
> this level, however it seems multiple computers would be better than
> one big one.  What is the advantage to so much RAM in one computer?


"If you were plowing a field, which would you rather use: Two strong oxen or
1024 chickens?" --Seymour Cray

Some problems are difficult or impossible to break up into parts that can be
run in parallel.  This huge system may be working on one of those problems.
And there's the inherent coolness factor in having as much RAM as regular
computers had disk a couple of years ago.  How fast would our DB server return
results if it could just load all ~100G of tables into RAM?  Probably 10 times
faster than it does, which is always nice.

--
Matt G / Dances With Crows
The Crow202 Blog:  http://crow202.org/wordpress/
There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see


---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss