It's unfortunate that someone deliberately comes up with something like
this that adds a lot of junk to a band that's already full of sources of
interference. Then there's that 2.4 ghz source you have in your kitchen
or office breakroom. I get my internet
connection wirelessly via the library across the street. My connection
dies whenever I use the microwave. While I'm waiting on my burrito to
cook, I can scan for available networks but won't find any.
Besides cordless phones, what sources of interference are there to
802.11n networks?
On 6/12/2012 22:36, Michael Butash wrote:
> Agreed, I see stupid hp devices even in enterprise printers they
> broadcast adhoc 802.11. Really annoying they make that default, but
> they treat wifi like bluetooth, and in fact i think it's because of
> the wifi pan standard being built into things like mice. Go figure,
> by HP. Only a win7 feature, uses a parasitic virtual device to tap
> it, and from reviews, it seems unreliable as hell.
>
> Bad part is, these show up in enterprise wireless systems like Cisco
> Wireless Lan Controllers as rogues, can/will attempt to "mitigate"
> them via a rf ddos as a policy. It's simply how they deal with
> security is many installations.
>
> Someones gonna buy a wifi mouse and wonder why their mouse never quite
> works right, probably just go chew on the poor help desk person. Not
> to mention it's just more interference to deal with in an enterprise
> wireless system in an already crowded 2.4ghz spectrum. Nothing really
> wrong with bluetooth, I don't know what they're trying to fix.
>
> I'm curious to see what happens if the standard becomes more prevalent.
>
> http://www.amazon.com/HP-WiFi-Mouse/dp/B00556O4YC
>
>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)