Re: Scientific Linux

That is correct because really the difference is in the support of the
code and the materials surrounding it. as they are both forks of the
RHEL open source code.

For me Centos was easier to work with because it had more information
and documentation.

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:34 PM, R P Herrold <herrold@owlriver.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Ben Browning wrote:
>
>> "Its primary purpose is to reduce duplicated effort of the labs, and to
>> have a common install base for the various experimenters."
>>
>> EG not a prod OS, in my opinion.
>
>
> ehh?
>
> It and CentOS are almost indistinguishable to a sysadmin who i not a
> distribution builder; the remaining principal of the distribution is: Connie
> Sieh, who is a friend.  the other long time member recently went to work at
> Red Hat
>
> -- Russ herrold
>        herrold centos org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss



--
A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from
rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.

Stephen
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss