Re: Brookings: CyberSecurity In the Balance - 2 New Bills

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Derek Trotter
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: Brookings: CyberSecurity In the Balance - 2 New Bills
Don't think of anything as too tinfoil hattish anymore. Not too long
ago, we would have thought it foolish to think the government would tell
us what kind of light bulbs we're allowed to buy. Beginning on January
1 it will be illegal to make or import 100 watt incandescent light
bulbs. It won't be too long before I'll have to shine a flashlight into
the oven to see if the pizza is done. I refuse to put one of those cf
bulbs in there. I don't want molten plastic and mercury on my tombstone.

Here's something I just thought of. A list of prohibited websites will
have everyone scrambling for a copy. People who are looking to download
pirated software will be tempted to get a copy of the blacklist so they
can find ways to get past the blocks to get to sites. A blacklist will
only make them easier to find.

Did anyone who read the article that started this thread see anything
saying either proposed law would even make an attempt to stop usenet?
Since the laws didn't even mention it, I wonder what newsgroups are
favored by those in congress.

On 11/17/2011 12:30 PM, Matt Graham wrote:
> From: Eric Shubert<>
>> I haven't read the legislation, but since windoze (xp/vista/7) runs its
>> own resolver (DNS cache), it's conceivable that this might apply to all
>> windoze hosts, depending on how the word "server" is defined.
> Practically all the machines at work have extensive /etc/hosts files in case
> the DNS boxes have a cow. I wonder if a stupid legislator would consider that
> a "server" in the right circumstances. If not, I'd think a bunch of people
> would start trading multi-M hosts.bz2 files and not paying as much attention
> to DNS. If so, really stupid stuff would happen, like saying, "A hosts file
> with more than N entries or entries for @HOSTNAMES is totally evidence that
> the possessor is attempting to subvert various laws!"
>
> That's pretty tinfoil-hattish. It's also something I could see people doing
> if they were completely idiotic, or thought they could get more money and
> power by doing.
>

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss