On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 14:05 -0600,
joe@actionline.com wrote:
> Why do some image viewers force the use of a .jpeg suffix
> instead of just using the more universal .jpg suffix?
I would think that any program wpould recognized either, same with .tif
vs. .tiff
I believe the four character extension came first but DOS and early
versions of Windoze could only recognize a three character extension.
Dennis Kibbe
--
Adjunct Faculty
Linux Operating System and System Administration
Business and Information Systems
Mesa Community College, Mesa, Arizona
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)