Re: Versioning system - Subversion Vs. Git

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Judd Pickell
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: Versioning system - Subversion Vs. Git
I haven't seen anything in your posts that would indicate that GIT
would be better than SVN for your needs, with the exception of the
following:

>
> Basically all I need is a way to track updates and keep someone from over writing someone else's changes.
>


Obviously there is no absolutely certain way to prevent someone from
overwriting another person's changes. However with GIT you would get a
more comprehensive way to compare and evaluate changes to figure out
how to solve the issue when such things happen. I prefer SVN myself,
but only more for familiarity than any other reason.

Although for my current employment I Perforce, which is actually okay.
I hated it at first, felt too much like Source Safe for my liking, but
having working on an entire project from beginning to end only using
Perforce I can say I actually kind of enjoy it. It's branching and
versioning work pretty well and I am rarely stuck on bad merge issues.

Sincerely,
Judd Pickell
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss