Lol. Let us just say if I have to shut it down I am not going to be
happy. Failover is both time consuming and risky and should not have
to be done for something so trivial as a lazy app/os.
On 11/4/10, R P Herrold <
herrold@owlriver.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Bryan O'Neal wrote:
>
>> Setting swapiness is how I can deal with a recurrence but it will not
>> flush current swap. And I can not shut down any process to perform
>> swap off. :(
>
> then you have not yet adequately provided for failover -- If a
> process 'can not be shut down', it has not business being on
> only one server without a failover capacity
>
> Solve the failover problem, and you both increase reliability
> of the service, and make possible regular administration
>
> -- Russ herrold
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)