Re: OT (slightly): SSL Requirement

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Lisa Kachold
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: OT (slightly): SSL Requirement
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:25 PM, R P Herrold <> wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Lisa Kachold wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Bryan O'Neal <
>> > wrote:
>>
>> So you do name based virtual hosts with SSL and without SNI? I would
>>> love to see your config files!
>>> - As always you teach us lowly mortals so much ;)
>>>
>>
> Which was not the question asked by Eric 'shubes', or that I answered, of
> course ---
>
> We were asked to have a load balancer or such at a public address, IN FRONT
> of a backend filled with a collection of potentially differing units, with
> RFC-1918 addressed backends and if the SSL tunnel might be established by
> the front end and used by the back ends.
>
> The answer remains: no
>
>
> Hey, I just bungle along too.
>>
>
> no argument from me on that -- seems you shoot from the hit a lot, though
>
> -- Russ herrold
>
>

Ah, yes not unless you have SSL hardware cards or an Ultra Monkey noarp load
balancer where the director does the RFC-1918?


I hits from the shoots also.


http://www.obnosis.com/motivatebytruth/basic-math.jpg
--
Office: (602)239-3392
AT&T: (503)754-4452
http://it-clowns.com <http://it-clowns.com/wiki/index.php?title=Obnosis>
"Faith is, at one and the same time, absolutely necessary and altogether
impossible. "
--Stanislav Lem
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss