now your just being silly! <smile>
I am requesting top posting, or at the very least, a lot of trimming to get to the point.
imagine trying to real loads and loads of responses in a single mail just to get to the last (and most recent) reply using braille or speech only (no screen, no eyes!). I am now blind enough that large print is no longer feasible and the other two methods are slow (getting faster). but still, being forced to listen to 3, 4, 5, or even 6 layers of quotes? NO THANK YOU!
I ask for a bit of understanding here.
On Aug 13, 2010, at 4:23 PM, ChasM Marshall wrote:
>
>
> This certainly IS like herding cats, or ducks or, or...
>
> A thread starts with a subject created by the first author and his/her question.
> I was offhand wondering why so MANY replies are NOT made to the original post.
> Nor even to the topic's author. Dialog for it's own sake. Reminds me of FOX news.
> Opinions on opinions of opinions for opinions by opinions . . .
> Well, okay it's not ALL pure junk.
>
> So,
> Usually there are multiple direct replies before a topic's author can respond.
> The cruft accumulates, and no one (politely) trims off the bottoms or the tops.
> There oughta be a law!
> But instead there will prolly be some newfangled thread enforcement program nobody likes.
> Kinda like the M$ crud at the bottom of my free mail.
>
> I can't wait for side-posting. Aren't some languages right to left?
>
> For example,
> Anyone speak Apache? Here's an unreplied coding question (07/31):
>
> ---.htaccess
>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)