Re: no commentary on SCO v. Novell ?

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Stephen
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: no commentary on SCO v. Novell ?
I find it amusing that Novell slapped SCO and SCO had the balls to try
this. It was pretty plain that they Had acquire the IP legitimately
and were quite happy leaving the world alone SCO was not and their
case was done until they could prove it was their IP.

was a very poor and sad strategy on SCO's part and at one time they
had a very solid product...

On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Craig White <> wrote:
> http://www.novell.com/prblogs/?p=2153
>
> perhaps expected but jury ruled SCO did not have the copyrights.
>
> Craig
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>




--
A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from
rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.

Stephen
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss