you guys are great! keep it up. I'm leaning towards Ruby but am still open.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Kevin Fries <
kfries6@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have developed in allot of languages, and when the original question was
> asked about language I suggested Ruby. But I think there was a little
> confusion about that.
>
> Ruby and Rails (i.e. RoR) are two completely different things. Rails is a
> web application framework. What this means is that it is used to build
> applications, not websites, that use the web for interaction with the user
> the way a C program would use X. What I suggested the OP learn if they
> wanted to learn to program with a modern language is Ruby... Not rails.
>
> Ruby has all the basics, and holds on to OO principles better than any
> other language... Even Java. It also has IRB an interactive environment
> where a programmer can play in a live session and see immediate cause and
> effect. Plus, there are a plethora of books and websites on writing Ruby
> programs.
>
> Why not Python? It also has the interactive shell doesn't it? Well yes it
> does, but it has many security issues, and does not properly follow OO
> principles. While learning, you should learn in an environment that
> enforces proper form, Python does not do that because the language is
> missing too many elements. I would put Mono and Visual Basic in this same
> category.
>
> Why not Java? It follows proper OO principles doesn't it? Why yes it
> does. But there is no learning environment like Python and Ruby.
>
> Why not a procedural language like C or Perl? Too many modern environments
> use OO for interactive programs. Servers are a different story, but
> learning to program by learning to write servers is like teaching your 16
> year old to drive in an 18 wheeler. They will learn allot more, but not the
> easiest path to the desired goal.
>
> And finally, well if C is the wholly grail, but you want it OO, why not
> C++? If you ever used C++, like I have, you would not ask that question.
>
> Far too often people confuse learning with practicality. Some languages
> are good at some things, some are good at others. The OP asked for a
> language that he could learn how to program and there were allot of fandom
> posturing, over this language or that. What got lost in much of the
> conversation is that this is not about what language is good gor task x or
> task y, but instead what language will help the OP learn to program with a
> modern language.
>
> I hope this clearifies my previous comments.
>
> Kevin
>
> Sent from my Nokia phone
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)