I'd stay away from compiling kernels unless you are doing LFS or you
_REALLY_ know what you are doing _AND_ you are trying to accomplish
something _REALLY_ esoteric.
I'd go with whatever kernel your flavor of Linux provides (which will most
likely be 2.6.*).
What are you running?
Of course, a geeky addiction can always overcome common sense (which is not
all that common... :)
I'd apply here one of those aviation wisdom tidbits:
Good judgement comes from experience.
Experience comes from bad judgement... ;-)
ET
Nathan England writes:
>
> I recently hit the kernel.org website looking to see what the latest stable
> kernel version number is, and I noticed they have listed 5 stable kernels
>
> 1. 2.6.32.3
> 2. 2.6.31.11
> 3. 2.6.30.10
> 4. 2.6.27.43
> 5. 2.4.37.7
>
> While I realize the 2.4 series have long been seen as the stable "legacy" of
> sorts, what is the deal with the other 4? I cannot find any reviews that
> describe the differences. I use a lot of intel systems, so I am interested in
> using the latest intel video drivers which they say requires the 2.6.32.2+
> kernel. I am currently running the 2.6.30.X, but it seems to me there are
> multiple stable branches, how do I know which to use?
>
> Does anyone know of a recent review on kernel versions?
>
> Nathan
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)