Re: An Ext4 question...

Michael Butash wrote:
> Sounds like you're reaching inode limitations or something, validate
> with 'sudo tune2fs -l /dev/sda1 | grep "Free inode"'. You can change
> wtih tune2fs as well, at least with ext2/3, really haven't worked much
> with ext4 to know.
>
> I still stick with reiser mostly, it's a killer filesystem.

Hehehe.

>
> -mb
>
>
> On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 07:09 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
>> Jim March wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> Does anybody know what happens when you stash a huge number of tiny
>>> files in Ext4? Does it store them efficiently the way ReiserFS does?
>>>
>>> I ask because I'm running into limitations on mailbox sized with
>>> Thunderbird and MBox, and was considering jumping to something based
>>> on MailDir, which as far as I can tell has bigger mailbox limits than
>>> MBox. But given MailDir's approach of one file per message, block
>>> size issues will get really wild'n'wooly unless Ext4 handles that
>>> better.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Jim
>> I don't know about ext4, but ext3 handles fairly large maildirs just
>> fine. I'm using dovecot on a qmail-toaster server, and have no problem
>> with some maildir folders with 7k+ messages (number of messages, not
>> sizes). IIRC, ext3 has a limit of 32k or so files in a folder.
>>
>


--
-Eric 'shubes'

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss