I should have mentioned, I have no issues with servers, only desktops
running x. I have a server in my house with a year and a half uptime
with vmware on hardy. :)
-mb
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 13:32 -0700, Stephen wrote:
> I honestly have not seen this as an issue before, but i usually poked
> my machines with a sick until they rebooted once a week because of
> what i was doing to them.
>
> the servers i have running run for a month at a time without a reboot.
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Michael Butash<michael@butash.net> wrote:
> > Has anyone else seen or experienced persistent memory leaks with ubuntu
> > 32bit or 64? I've literally had issues with it that may or may not be
> > particularly ubuntu issues back to 7.04 that I first noticed. The only
> > thing really in common system-wise is the hardware, and I somewhat
> > suspect it's Nvidia driver related, but nothing really indicates any
> > particular app. My primary desktop I use heavily just about anything,
> > but I have another system that's sole purpose is to play movies and
> > music on my TV I do almost nothing with that experiences the same
> > issues, NVidia card as well. With compiz or without this happens. Only
> > thing I haven't tried is running the NV drivers, but I rely on the
> > acceleration far too much on both systems.
> >
> > What I have noticed is there are no direct applications hogging memory
> > via top, rather it seems virtual memory ends up simply taking over all
> > physical memory and keeping it as "inactive" via "vmstat -a". Signs of
> > this include firefox flipping out, rendering/scaling video larger than
> > default, and just anything else that requires excessive memory use
> > having issues. I graph my physical memory usage via snmp, and I can
> > pretty accurately gauge how long I have until I need to do a hard reboot
> > to reclaim the "inactive" memory. It mostly works even memory starved
> > in this condition, just limits my usage, and even restarting x doesn't
> > help. Interestingly enough, neither system ever swaps at all...
> >
> > Has anyone successfully ever dealt with an issue like this killing
> > virtual memory? I really can't imagine I'm the only one... I've hunted
> > far and wide of the great interweb for a way to release the "inactive"
> > memory, as I'd even just go so far as to purge it once a day via cron if
> > I had to, but I can find nothing of forcefully clearing inactive/dirty
> > virtual memory space. I've seen others complain of the same behavior,
> > but have only seen the same rhetoric that "trust linux virtual memory
> > behavior, that's what it's supposed to do". Act like a stupid windoze
> > me install and reboot daily? I think not...
> >
> > -mb
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)