Re: ext? as fat or ntfs?

Stephen wrote:
> For me with linux/windows i woudl create Fat 32 on volumes 2gb or less
> or ntfs on volumes larger.
>
> not the best choice but it is the most simple and portable one. fat
> will even allow OSX compatability.
>
> anything more complicated tar-gzip and a portable version of 7zip or
> winrar if you need to keep complex file structures and permissions.
>

Right, but ntfs is strictly nonfree. Hans wants to get around ntfs/fat
in total, at a physcial partition level.

Ryan

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss