just because one is paranoid does not mean they are not out to get you :-)
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:38 PM, James Mcphee <
jmcphe@gmail.com> wrote:
> Vigilant, but not paranoid. XSS exists for a reason. A better solution
> IMHO would be to require the remote content to be signed by a particular
> source or something along those lines. Just my 2 cents.
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Stephen <cryptworks@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> given Lisa's previous rants I'm thinking both, and she would be right.
>>
>> it is in everyone's best interest to be vigilant.
>>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Alex Dean <alex@crackpot.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On May 15, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Lisa Kachold wrote:
>> >
>> >> it's IMPORTANT to realize that WE ALL MUST BE SECURITY EXPERTS
>> >
>> > Who is 'we'? Programmers/admins/hackers, or the general public?
--
A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from
rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.
Stephen
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)