Re: My Open Source (not officially so yet) License

I would pay for the court transcript when you sue someone for
violating that license.

"It is alleged that, on April 1 2015, Defendant did knowingly and with
malice aforethought duplicate software programs and code licensed by
Plaintiff, and did expressly failed to comply with Subsection 3.2.15
(Chicken Dance), commonly referred to as the 'Dancing Clause'.
Plaintiff seeks relief in the immediate performance of said Dance by
Defendant."

On May 6, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Stephen wrote:

> I want to relese code under a licences that makes people have to do
> the chicken dance...
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Lisa Kachold
> <lisakachold@obnosis.com> wrote:
>> Insane!
>>
>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Andrew "Tuna" Harris
>> <tuna@supertunaman.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Helloes.
>>>
>>> I am working on an open source license of my very own. Basically, I
>>> think IP is just ridiculous (inb4 flameware. No. NO. NO!), so I'm
>>> creating a license that is less restrictive than the GPL (you
>>> don't HAVE
>>> to redistribute full source code), but provides me with more lulz
>>> than
>>> the BSD license. I like the BSD license, in an egocentric world it's
>>> one of the few things that makes sense. Unfortunately, it doesn't
>>> spit
>>> back at people like I sometimes wish it did.
>>>
>>> So, I added a clause to the BSD license, and the result is the
>>> Chicken
>>> Dance License! Info and the license text are available here:
>>> http://bit.ly/DOnV9
>>>
>>> For those of you who are afraid of compressed URLs or behind a
>>> corporate
>>> firewall, my license pretty much has the following conditions for
>>> proprietary stuff:
>>>

>>> - For every thousand units sold, half or more of the employees must
>>>        listen to the Chicken Dance
>>> - For every million, two employees have to perform the chicken  
>>> dance,
>>>        and a video of it (encoded in OGG Theora format) must be
>>>        submitted to the author of the CDL-license software
>>> - Nobody with the company that produces the proprietary software  
>>> may say
>>>        the word "plinth" out in public.

>>>
>>> For non-proprietary stuff, it's just the BSD license.
>>>
>>> Does it match up with the Open Source Definition? As far as I can
>>> tell,
>>> it seems to. I'm not asking for money or power, just a little dance.
>>>
>>> Thoughts? I'm all ears. Just no flamewars plz kthx.
>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> www.obnosis.com (503)754-4452
>> "Contradictions do not exist." A. Rand
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>
>
>
>
> --
> A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from
> rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.
>
> Stephen
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss