Re: Converting ext3 to ext4 - results (Re: ext3 vs ext4)

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Nathan England
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: Converting ext3 to ext4 - results (Re: ext3 vs ext4)


one of the articles I read yesterday says the initial fsck of a drive will
take as long as a normal fsck on ext3, then subsequent fsck'ing will be
faster...

http://kernelnewbies.org/Ext4#head-9a25213c5b924bdb8b33efbcb91bfa1279bd2b00

~~ From the article ~~

Fsck is a very slow operation, especially the first step: checking all the
inodes in the file system. In Ext4, at the end of each group's inode table will
be stored a list of unused inodes (with a checksum, for safety), so fsck will
not check those inodes. The result is that total fsck time improves from 2 to
20 times, depending on the number of used inodes
(http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Improving_fsck_Speeds_in_Ext4). It must be
noticed that it's fsck, and not Ext4, who will build the list of unused
inodes. This means that you must run fsck to get the list of unused inodes
built, and only the next fsck run will be faster (you need to pass a fsck in
order to convert a Ext3 filesystem to Ext4 anyway). There's also a feature that
takes part in this fsck speed up - "flexible block groups" - that also speeds
up filesystem operations.

- nathan
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss