On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 12:22 -0700, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
> Larry, the problem though with Wikipedia is that the actual basis of
> credibility on which a given article rests is virtually intractable.
> There are thousands of apparent contributors all adding, deleting,
> editing portions of the article and there is absolutely no way in the
> Wiki medium to determine which portions of the article are coming from
> credible sources. The Wiki idea works when you have a high level of
> trust in all potential participants, when you've got various
> contributors with a variety of motives the medium becomes corrupted
> VERY quickly. At this point anyone who has used Wikipedia seriously
> no longer considers it to be a stable system, despite what Jimbo tells
> you.
----
what does that make me...chopped liver?
----
> The Google Knol idea did somewhat address these shortcomings.
----
Google good, Wikipedia bad...I'm so behind on memes...
Craig
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)