RE: OT- 5th undersea cable cut!

True, but by the time we cause damage that took time to repair, we were
already their. I just think we have proven we have the power to be more
sophisticated. We could easily set it up so we could interrupt traffic
on all lines at will, so why would we cut them?

-----Original Message-----
From: plug-discuss-bounces@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-bounces@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of
Kristian Erik Hermansen
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 5:55 PM
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: 5th undersea cable cut!

On Feb 7, 2008 4:51 PM, Bryan O'Neal <BONeal@cornerstonehome.com> wrote:
> To help dissuade the conspiracy theorists... If you take the cold war
> example, we rarely "cut" the cables. Our past policy as been to
> non-invasively tap the cables. We can then either listen, disrupt, or
> inject. It provides a lot more flexibility since we can lay the
device and
> leave it waiting until we are ready.

In the very first gulf war, communications were the primary targets
prior to the actual military invasion...
--
Kristian Erik Hermansen
"Know something about everything and everything about something."
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss