Judd Pickell wrote:
> Sorry, but this argument falls on its face when you consider the cost
> of the console and quality of the game. When a console costs as much
> as the upgrades to a PC, I hardly call that being better. Especially
> since the cost of the games is almost the same.
You seem to miss my point entirely. I disagree with your arguments but
we're quite off topic I think.
Let me recap:
Chris made a point about gaming on windows being better than other PC
platforms. I did NOT disagree with this statement--in fact I agreed
with it. But I went a step further and made a point that gaming on
Windows stinks compared to consoles.
I then gave reasons why PC gaming (Windows, LInux, MAc) is never as
simple and easy as a console. I am the one who gets calls from friends
and family to help with their stupid PC problems. I"ll be happy to
refer them to you if you disagree with my assessment. ;)
I ended by saying people who want to play games should buy consoles (so
that they dont' call ME when they have problems.)
You seemed to reply with something along the lines of: consoles are
lower quality and more expensive to upgrade than PCs. Again, I disagree
with this but it's OK to disagree with each other.
Then you proceeded to explain why LInux has few commercial games. Yes I
agree with all of that and it only reinforces my point.
I don't think there's anything constructive to say here. I suppose you
can reply if I've misunderstood your response but is this discussion
serving any purpose? I'm regretting that I replied to the OP.
- --
JT Morée
PC Xperience, Inc.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)