On Dec 13, 2007 1:14 PM, <
alex@crackpot.org> wrote:
> As I understood one of your previous messages, you made the point that
> early-stage application architecture decisions make scaling with
> cheaper hardware more feasible. I agreed, and followed up with some
> ideas about how one might do this.
Not cheaper hardware, robust solutions that can scale from lightweight
DB software to larger solutions at a later time without much if any
rewrite.
>
> If you had ideas other than those, please share. Or don't, it's
> Bryan's thread. If he's got what he needs to get going, this can just
> die.
It sounds like he has quite a bit to chew on idea wise with memcached,
performance testing postgres & mysql, and the other ideas peppered
through this thread.
I apologize if you thought I was "calling you out", just the concept
of pulling away from a relational database for long-term storage had
to be challenged.
--Dan
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)