On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 07:59 -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> I just find it interesting that there's all this talk of 64-bit on Intel
> processors. I never considered them much of a player in 64-bit. I'd love
> to hear how and why you people have done so. I don't want flames: I'm
> truly curious.
----
I know that I was pretty clear that I started into x86_64 on these Dell
systems because of less hassles with installation/operation and for the
most part, they've been running well.
There has been some regression on the 2.6.23 kernel but I suspect that
this is the price that I pay for trying to run software that is close to
the current development edge but considering the nature of release early
and often, I have confidence that these things get worked out over time
and view my participation in bug reporting and feedback as the necessary
part of participation.
Obviously Intel is a late comer to 64 bit processing but they are the
800 pound gorilla so they're kind of hard to ignore and given their
exceptional support of the open source community, I have no problem with
this.
Craig
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)