Re: CentOS and LVM partitions

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Craig White
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: CentOS and LVM partitions
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 11:44 -0700, der.hans wrote:
> moin moin,
>
> CentOS is wanting to install the /boot partition on a primary partition
> and the rest of the partitions on an LVM partition.
>
> fdisk -l then only lists two partitions. One needs to know to put
> subsequent boot partitions as primary or extended rather than LVM.
>
> It also becomes not so easy to debug partition issues because you can't
> see them through normal mechanisms.
>
> Anybody have an opinion on using LVM partitions? The greatest thing since
> USB to SATA adapters? Some badly done sci fi horror? It's the future, so
> just get used to it?
>

----
All Red Hat based installers for quite some time (3 or 4 years IIRC)
will default to using LVM for everything but the /boot partition. If you
want to go without LVM, you can choose to manually configure partitions
in the anaconda installer (and not do LVM) if that makes you feel
better.

I don't recall ever creating another /boot partition nor ever having a
reason to do so. What I am I missing from your question?

--
Craig White <>

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss