It could be that it was a RAID 5 that had a failure and is now reporting
as a RAID 1. (2 mirror's with no parity) Some controllers may do this
automatically.
Just a thought, and I'm probably wrong.
Steve
Randy Melder wrote:
> This is what gets me:
> "If up to N-1 disks are removed (or crashes), all data are still
> intact. If there are spare disks available, and if the system (eg.
> SCSI drivers or IDE chipset etc.) survived the crash, reconstruction
> of the mirror will immediately begin on one of the spare disks, after
> detection of the drive fault."
> ( http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO-1.html#ss1.4 )
>
> Does that mean the spare disk is empty until a fault or removal of one
> of the drives?
>
> I guess I'm just looking for something that says "Spare disks in the
> array maintain the same mirror at all times even after failure of N-1
> disks."
>
> Am I splitting hairs?
>
> ; ) .randy
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)