I am aware of that, I was just using the articles title and info from
it to post it. I am just glad someone else is going to start taking
some more of M$'s money and they are Linux friendly.
On 5/11/07, Joshua Zeidner <
jjzeidner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Shawn,
>
> Google may be after the 'market share' of Microsoft, but the two companies
> count their assets quite differently.
>
> Microsoft's asset was their hold on the OS market and the control that
> this granted them in a variety of venues. Google, on the other hand counts
> it's primary asset as its /usage information/ of its applications, and the
> actual document data itself( which you sign away the rights to in your user
> agreement ). Being that all its software is net-based and hosted remotely,
> Google is aware of *every single click you make*. This gives them strategic
> information of development investment/return on a scale that makes Microsoft
> look like a bunch of useless wimps. For instance, if 5 million people start
> using the email feature for Google Reader, Google knows with great accuracy
> that expanding this feature set is a good investment. These kinds of
> decisions were made intuitively in older development paradigms. It seems
> that there are really only a handful of apps that do not want to live on the
> web, Photoshop seems like one of the lasting strongholds of desktop-based
> software*.
>
> Google's recent acquisition of Double Click makes their surveillance even
> more pervasive and complete as Double Click features ads in a great number
> of web sites. As a result of this recent acquisition, some are even calling
> for Anti-Trust action [1].
>
> This also introduces some new business dimensions that did not exist
> before. In the world run by Google, privacy is the most valued premium.
> Many do not understand how important maintaining privacy is in this new
> world. [2] Whatever your plans may be for world domination, exposing them
> to Google puts every investment firm with bottomless pockets one step ahead
> of whatever technical genius you may (think you) possess. Also of great
> concern is the position that companies such as Google gain over censorship
> mechanisms. I know of many web sites and blogs that have been removed from
> Google on baseless grounds of 'spam' or 'hate speech' etc. It is a great
> illusion that Google is wholly impartial to the content that it indexes.
>
> The biggest issues by far for the near future will be our laws for privacy
> and discrimination, which will be greatly emphasized by these new
> progressions. Its takes a combination of vision and technical knowledge to
> fully understand the extent to which equality is compromised by these new
> technologies. Also there have been some claims that Google is working with
> government agencies such as the NSA- can anyone here qualify these claims?
> [3]
>
>
> -jmz
>
>
>
> * as I have stated before, Adobe is a key company in the new IT landscape,
> because apps like Flash are acting as a pivot between the new world of
> online 'rich media apps' and the traditional desktop OS.
>
> [1]
> http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/article1687147.ece
>
> [2] interesting tech:
> http://firegpg.tuxfamily.org/index.php?page=home&lang=en
>
> [3] http://www.google-watch.org/jobad.html
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2005/12/12/DI2005121201136.html
> http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8041/
> ( I do not vouch for these sources )
>
>
>
>
> On 5/11/07, Shawn Badger <badger.shawn@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=22241&hed=Google+Comes+Clean+on+Microsoft+
> >
> >
> > A few excerts form the article:
> >
> > "Google today officially confirmed what many analysts have been saying
> > for months: the Mountain View, California-based search leader is going
> > after the software market in direct competition with Microsoft"
> >
> > "In a question and answer session with shareholders, one woman asked
> > Mr. Schmidt and Google co-founder Larry Page how they would avoid
> > becoming known as "the new Microsoft, and not in flattering terms."
> >
> >
> >
> > Mr. Page added, "It's natural to be concerned about it… We're not the
> > same kind of company" as others out there, Mr. Page said. "Our
> > engineers all run Linux. It's free. You can hack on it. It's deep in
> > our DNA""
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> >
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >
>
>
>
> --
> .0000. communication.
> .0001. development.
> .0010. strategy.
> .0100. appeal.
>
> JOSHUA M. ZEIDNER
> IT Consultant
>
> ( 602 ) 490 8006
> jjzeidner@gmail.com
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)