Re: another Q on XSL

I've tried a few, unfortunately they generally produce output little better than what OO.o would produce (i.e. terrible),
or else they require you to effectively hand-code the XML anyway. Truly, XML isn't intended for a person to generate,
it's intended for machines to generate from some other representation (i.e. OpenDocument XML).

I still say DocBook will cause much suffering, but if you must, then be sure you really understand it going in, it's
a quite complicated format, and the tools for working with DocBook are less-than-ideal.

Craig White wrote:
> I'll toss this out to the general populace but suspect that I am asking
> Joseph on this one...
>
> Anyone have experience with Serna, Oxygen or any of the 'non-free'
> XML/XSL somewhat WYSIWYG editors?
>
> (note to Joseph) I'm still thinking Docbook - still haven't finished the
> behemoth Beginning XML (WROX)
>
> Craig
>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss