I don't remember - does the boot log have time stamps?
Dazed_75 wrote:
> Too bad M$ thinks we are too stupid to show us all the startup messages
> that might allow you to see what is taking so long! :P
>
> On 12/31/06, *eric©* < ericlists@gmail.com <mailto:ericlists@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> I just picked up a quad Xeon server today. Verified working
> operation before I took it home. It was running Windows Server
> 2003, and booted up quite quickly. The guy cleared the SCSI RAID
> configs, and handed it over. I brought it home, and found the
> CD-ROM drive didn't want to release the tray. Didn't have any
> floppies on hand, so I just tossed my boot hard drive in the machine
> and installed a copy of Windows Server 2003 to the IDE drive (yes, I
> know this is a Linux list). Would have preferred Debian on there,
> but without a working CDROM, and no floppies......(I'm planning on
> stopping by Fry's this weekend to pick up a new CD-ROM drive for it)
>
> Anyways, the only thing I changed on the machine after getting it
> was setting up the 6 SCSI drives as one big stripe, and made the IDE
> drive the primary boot drive. Took over 3 hours to install Windows,
> and takes well over 20 mins just to boot now. Doesn't appear to be
> an issue with the IDE drive, as the majority of the time, there is
> no disc access. Once I log in, everything is quite snappy. I also
> noticed that the file copies in setup went by really quick.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> eric
>
--
-Eric 'shubes'
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss