Re: OT: C and C++

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Dazed_75
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: OT: C and C++
I would also add that although C was purely DESIGNED as procedural, a lot of
us back then began doing object oriented programming within C. Would have
been a lot easier with C++ but we did not have it then. The concepts
existed and had implementations in other languages, but for a C programmer
with existing code it just did not pay to switch languages with C++ coming.


Perhaps that is one reason I sat on the ANSII X3J11 committee for 2 years.
Tore me up when I had to quit due to my workload. Wish I could remember all
that stuff now days.

On 11/27/06, Micah DesJardins <> wrote:
>
> The only thing I would add to Ted's answer is that C++ adds support
> for object oriented programming. C has no concept of classes,
> instances, methods etc. It is pure procedural programming. OO
> programming gets all the press these days, but a lot of your favorite
> open source projects are written in good old fashioned C. (For speed,
> portability or historical reasons)
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>




--
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter
and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss