On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 04:57:54PM -0700, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
> I personally rate Compaq systems as having the lowest general Linux
> compatibility of all major brands. I had a similar problem with memory on a
> Compaq desktop Ubuntu install. It is surprising that BSD was easier for
> you, it may be just a function of your personal familiarity with BSD. I do
> not recommend BSD for general use, its ideal for high-security applications.
Yeah, Compaq's are not the most easily installed systems. This was just
a case of having too much going on during an install. A full KDE LiveCD
makes a horrible install platform on a low memory box.
The BSD thing isn't surprising, really. It's a simple, text-based
install. If you can slice up a disk then you can do it in your sleep.
I'm going to give Ubuntu/Kubuntu another try with the "alternate"
install ISO and see how that goes. I installed Ubuntu before and liked
it, but that was, what, 5.10? Whatever was before Dapper.
--
Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD Users Group
dwchandler@stilyagin.com | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/
http://www.stilyagin.com/ |
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)