Re: (Slightly OT) Forwarding email: inline vs as attachment

If it is inappropriate or a warning is needed before the user reads it?

On Thursday 13 July 2006 06:49, Eric "Shubes" wrote:
> I seem to remember reading something some time ago that led me to
> believe that forwarding "as attachment" was preferable (somehow better)
> than forwarding "inline". I may be mistaken.
>
> In the Thunderbird tutorial, I see this:
> Unless you have specific reasons not to include an email forward inline,
> you should let emails be forwarded inline, by consideration for the
> recipient: scrolling down is a lot easier than double clicking an email
> attachment.
>
> Can anyone explain why one would want to forward as attachment?
>
> TIA

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nathan England
Tonto Apache Tribe
Information Security Specialist
nengland@tontoapache.com
(928) 978.2513
http://10.0.1.2

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nathan England
PaysonLinux User Group
nathan@paysonlinux.org
http://www.paysonlinux.org/

Software Development
Website Development
Linux Administration
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss