Re: RH/Fedora Alternatives

I second Craig's comments.

-mj-

Craig White wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 10:38 -0700, Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>
>>Micah DesJardins wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Has anybody had an experiences with either White Box or Cent OS?
>>>
>>>Micah
>>
>>I've played a bit with CentOS after working with RH9 and Fedora. Looks
>>and feels the same. (It should, as the source is from RHEL).
>
> ----
> CentOS has incredible vitality - not only repackaging RHEL 3 and 4 but
> also CentOS Extras - and there are extra repositories such as Dag which
> will work with any RHEL or repackaged RHEL such as whiteboxlinux or
> centos.
>
> Whiteboxlinux is a single driver project so updates lag - John Morris
> developed whiteboxlinux for his employer, Beauregard Parish Library
> (Louisiana) and doesn't use anyone else's packages - only that which he
> does himself so if you really think you need timely updates,
> whiteboxlinux is not for you.
>
> Craig
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss