On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:59:34 -0700, Jared Anderson wrote
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:04:56 -0700, Alex Dean writes:
>...
>
> What does this mean? It means that Microsoft can now claim as
> its intellectual
> property several of the key concepts that make Web-browser
> technology possible. Theoretically, if you want to use these
> technologies - or any technology based on them - you now need to
> sign a licensing agreement with Microsoft. Imagine a world in which
> every Web site using CSS, DHTML, and XSL has to be Microsoft-certified.
>
> The situation may never get that bad, however. Microsoft has
> reported that it will offer "free and reciprocal" licensing
> agreements to anyone who wants to use "its" technology, adding that
> it is not even clear whether a license will be necessary.
First IANAL. I haven't read the patent....
Even if the patent is as it purports it is unenforceable -- prior art in the
form of an ISO standard style sheet language for SGML came in 1996 -- it was
invented way before that...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_Style_Semantics_and_Specification_Language
SGML and DSSSL were the real basis for the web standards. So the article was
right about the patent office -- it's very messed up. Can't even see the
obvious prior art...
Jeff
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)