RE: No Question with practical and ethical considerations.

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Dorian A. Monroe, II
Date:  
To: plug-discuss
Subject: RE: No Question with practical and ethical considerations.
------Original Message-----
-From:
-[mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Craig
-White
-Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 1:47 PM
-To:
-Subject: RE: No Question with practical and ethical considerations.
-
-On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 13:26 -0700, Bill Wesson wrote:
---8<---<snip>---8<---
---
-I am speaking of a personal opinion...
-
-If I buy a laptop with Windows 2000 (or Windows XP Professional) pre-
-installed, it is the computer that is licensed. The license is in the
-form of a sticker with the installation codes which is affixed to the
-bottom. I might be inclined to assume that THIS computer has a valid
-client license for Windows Terminal Server irrespective of the
-technicalities that you have cited.
-
-It is possible that a court of law could rule against me favoring the
-specific language of the licensing restrictions of Windows Terminal
-Server and it is possible that a court of law could agree that this
-machine has a valid license affixed to it. I am not a lawyer and I have
-not done this nor am I aware of any litigation to this topic or similar
-which could be presented as precedent.
----


I disagree. You're licensed to run Windows 2000 (or XP) on that laptop and
assuming that this OS came with a Terminal Services CAL, you are legit to
access a Terminal Server configured to allow properly licensed clients to
access it from that Windows 2000 (or XP) installation. When you wipe it and
install any other OS, or even in a dual-boot environment, the other OS would
need to have a separate CAL to access the Terminal Server. As far as the
Terminal Server is concerned, that other OS is a separate client requiring
it's own CAL, irregardless if it's running on the same hardware. Same goes
for virtual machines (MS Virtual PC, VMWare, etc) running under a host OS.
The virtual PCs have their own OS installation, and if you are accessing a
terminal server (or Exchange Server, SQL Server, etc, for that matter) the
virtual machine would need it's own CAL for that service.

So even though your machine has Windows XP installed with a valid Terminal
Services CAL, when you boot into Linux, that Linux installation will need a
separate CAL to access the Terminal Server. The Windows XP TS CAL is only
valid when you're accessing Terminal Services from your Windows XP
installation.

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss