On Wednesday 03 November 2004 10:23, Rob Wultsch wrote:
> Query smart and see what that says. If smart does not like the drive
> replace it with all possible haste.
Thanks, that helped.
SMART *did* see an error, but aborted its testing immediately so all I
knew was there was at least one read error. (The quick test didn't find
anything, and the extended test aborted as described. Not very impressive.)
On the other hand, "/sbin/badblocks /dev/hda3" (the failing partitition)
was much more descriptive. It turned up 23 failures. One of my associates
said I could then use "/sbin/e2fsck -c /dev/hda3" to essentially map-out the
bad areas but, with that number of failures, a replacement drive was probably
a good idea.
I'm gonna replace it tomorrow.
Tonight I'll pick up a 2.5" --> IDE adapter and attempt to "dd" a copy on
my workstation and then dump (er, "dd") that back out to the new drive.
(That'll copy the bad block list, too -- not sure what to do about that
except re-run e2fsck on the new drive.)
Anyway, thanks again.
--
Ed Skinner,
ed@flat5.net,
http://www.flat5.net/
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss