Michael Havens wrote:
> You know,
> Last night I was looking at the source code of a web page and it looke alot
> like 'C'. HTML must be to C what Bluefish is to HTML. Am I right? Gosh, I
> want to learn C so bad it hurts. Well, I'll create my webpage and then learn
> C. I know that webpages written in C must load quikly but my page is going to
> be so simple that it won't matter.
If you are going to write html, please at least consider doing it in a
'compliant' manner.
The w3c validator page is your friend:
http://validator.w3.org/
more links:
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Guide
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1
http://jessey.net/simon/xhtml_tutorial/
Not all browsers display HTML (or XHTML) correctly, Microsoft's IE seems
particularly bad about this. If your pages are fairly simple you won't have a
problem, but testing is a good idea.
- --
KevinO
If built in great numbers, motels will be used for nothing but illegal
purposes.
-- J. Edgar Hoover
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)