Re: database (now "MySQL/PHP")

Trent Shipley wrote:

>>Hmm.... could you clarify that? I have Apache 2.x running on my server
>>and I use the short tags for php with no problems. I am not using any
>>kind of xml though.
>
>
> Dang! I must be wrong. I remember having the short tags fail somewhere, I
> just can't remember where. Still, some authors say they are bad style.
>
The short tags *will* fail if not set in php.ini. This is definately a
php to my knowledge.

> In either case HTML is a subset of either SGML or XML (depending on the
> version of HTML) and
> <? .. ?>
> marks application specific processing info in default SGML. XML is basically
> a standardized version of SGML so in XML
> <? .. ?>
> is always a processing instruction.
I'll have to look into the specs on w3c.org. This is the first time I
have run across this information. Files with the php extension are
handled by the php interpreter as configured in the Apache conf files,
so the processing instruction would be handled by the php interpreter.


Patrick
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss