Mozilla or better yet... (OT -- Tux Health?)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=____1077061238769_YJ12D'58Vw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Just to be sure I don't stick my foot in my mouth and discuss overlapping technology, I will install the latest Firefox release tonight and compare them for y'all.

anthony

From: June Tate <mondoshawan@theonelab.com>
Date: 2004/02/17 Tue PM 06:37:01 EST
To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Subject: Re: Mozilla or better yet... (OT -- Tux Health?)

On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 15:49, Don Calfa wrote:
> I'd like to see that list.

As would I, and probably more than half of this list. =op

> I feel that Mozilla is most functional.

If not the most functional, certainly the most extensible of any browser
out there that I think of. =o)

> I use daily:

<snip>

> Tux Health,

What is this "Tux Health"? Is it a plugin, extension, or...?

--
June Tate * mondoshawan@theonelab.com * http://www.theonelab.com

------=____1077061238769_YJ12D'58Vw
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
    name="signature.asc"
Content-Disposition: inline;
    filename="signature.asc"

LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0NClZlcnNpb246IEdudVBHIHYxLjIuNCAo
R05VL0xpbnV4KQ0KDQppRDREQlFCQU1xV2RlNWkrR3NUVGxwa1JBa2U0QUpkOHJKcFdGdUdR
VUNwV2ozZU9nemVqMWZZYUFKNCtvNithDQpONldhc2lEdklvSjdFMWxrN0o1ZldRPT0NCj1i
S1JRDQotLS0tLUVORCBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0NCg0K
------=____1077061238769_YJ12D'58Vw--