http://www.userlinux.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?White_Paper
PLEASE Read this and comment.
:-)Mike(-:
----- Original Message -----
From: Derek Neighbors
Sent: 2/4/2004 1:29:01 PM
To:
plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Cc:
chris@GCCodeFactory.biz
Subject: Re: Which distro for the enterprise now?
Chris Gehlker said:
> On Feb 4, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Derek Neighbors wrote:
>
>> To be clear I am not saying the RHEL product is bad. Therefore, I
>> don't
>> see the need for someone else to repackage it. I think the binding of
>> support to the license is less than desirable.
>
> You seem to be missing the point that the mere fact that others have
> the *ability* to repackage RHEL means that the binding of support to
> the license is very weak, simple branding as opposed to lock-in.
You appear to be missing the fact (as I am lead to believe) that there ar=
e
part of RHEL that are not available for others to "repackage".
>> For example this is why UserLinux is starting. They basically want to
>> have a more updated version of Debian (but will put all their stuff
>> back
>> into Debian) and not have licensing issue.
>
> I think what UserLinux is trying to do is very similar to what Red Hat
> already does. They are trying to establish a brand with 'authorized
> service.' In the case of UserLinux the service is provided by
> independent contractors but they are still authorized by the UserLinux
> distributor and use their brand. In short, it's simply a franchise
> version of the Red Hat model. Bruce Parens said as much on /..
The major difference is UserLinux is not a for profit company. They have
no particular financial motivator to do things. They are leaving it to
the "contractors" to do the work. This is a large distinction, because i=
t
is forcing those contractors to truly compete on a level ground. The
operating system is the same for everyone a true commodity.
I will not clutter the list with the discussion any longer. We can agree
to disagree and that's okay. I know the primary issue here is one of
capitalist mindset that says if a company can have a "monopoly" in some
fashion their employees will starve. This is pitted against a socialist
like concept that says money can exchange hand without greed being a
factor. We have come to a point that I think it's a matter of "where do
you draw the line". Politically I draw the line one place, you and other=
s
another.
-Derek
-Derek
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
This message has been scanned for viruses by the VEI Internet
Automatic Email Spam and Virus Scanner, and is believed to be free of spa=
m or viruses.
Please report spam to
spamtrap@vei.net. If you would like 98.9 % spam blo=
cked from your
E-mail then go to VEI Internet for details. Anti-spam/Anti-virus is FREE =
with every account.=20
http://www.vei.net/
mailtospamtrap@vei.net
(text/plain)