On Nov 26, 2003, at 8:53 AM, Fritz wrote:
> I just purchased a cheap-ass digital camera which takes
> either "SD" or "MMC" flash memory in 16MB, 32MB,
> 64MB, or 128MB sizes. Quick research reveals that
> there are (at least) half a dozen different types of flash
> memory ... and I assume this is just a replay of the old
> VHS vs. Beta (or "DVD+" vs. "DVD-") competition,
> i.e. a strategy to lock-in consumers. I have two questions:
>
> 1.) Of the two flavors that my camera accepts, SD or MMC,
> are there compelling reasons for purchasing either one?
> Has either one established a clear market lead? What about
> technical advantages?
from=20
<
http://www.datarecovery-europe.com/speicherkarten/secure_Digital.htm>
The 32 mm x 24 mm x 2.1 mm Secure Digital memory card =96 called SD Card=20=
for short =96 is a development based on the MultiMediaCard (MMC). Unlike=20=
the MMC, the SD card specification offers the option of saving=20
copyright protected data, 4 times the transfer speed of MMC, a write=20
protection switch and protective measures against static discharges in=20=
the card housing. The SD card has nine connection contacts (versus=20
seven for the MultiMediaCard), meaning twice as many data lines as the=20=
MMC, which makes possible data transfer rates up to 10 MByte per=20
second.
Due to its somewhat thicker housing in comparison with the MMC, more=20
memory components can be integrated into the SD card, which allows for=20=
greater memory capacities. Because the other dimensions are identical=20
to the MMC, MultiMediaCards can always be used in devices that have an=20=
SD Card socket.
>
> 2.) Is there a good local source for this stuff and what might
> one expect to pay for it?
I got a 256K at Buy.com and it seems like it was under $50. That's=20
enough for about 250 shots on standard settings.
(text/plain)