Does it need to be blank though?
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 06:21 am, Scott wrote:
> > I just tried this on sda5 (which I know I created) and got the same
> > response. Do you think I should just start over? I don't. I think
> > thaat the insight I will receive from getti9ng it to work as-is could
> > be inval;ueable; but if that mkfs needs to be run and the drive needs
> > to be empty, then that is what needs to happen.
> >
> > :)~MIKE~(:
> >
> >
> > mke2fs 1.34-WIP (21-May-2003)
> > /mnt/sda5 is not a block special device.
> > Proceed anyway? (y,n) y
> > mkfs.ext2: Device size reported to be zero. Invalid partition
> > specified, or
> > partition table wasn't reread after running fdisk, due to
> > a modified partition being busy and in use. You may need to
> > reboot to re-read your partition table.
> >
> > root@bmike1:/mnt#
>
> One thing, you have to run mkfs on an unmounted partition ( i.e /dev/sdXX
> ). Standard disclamer: I make no claims of responsibility for lost files,
> bla, bla, bla.
>
> Scott
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)