--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:34:00PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> With free software / open source - you get the source code.
>=20
> This means that you can modify at will, ensure distribution on any and
> all machines without restriction. You are not locked into a software
> investment owned by a corporation and thus subject to their marketing /
> upgrade whims, their financial demise or acquisition by a competitor who
> ultimately discontinues development of the software.
Just out of curiosity, how does this compare with Microsoft's "Shared
Source" program? You obtain the rights to most of the source code,
and, unless you are under a time-based license, you own the software
forever. Of primary interest are:
* Microsoft owns the source code and any changes you make to it.
- You can't change the software to include company secrets. The
GPL allows you to redistribute the changed binary within the
company without releasing the source code.
- I don't think you can give your changes to other organizations.
If another company is having the same problems, could you help
point them in the right direction at least?
* What happens if Microsoft goes out of business? Does the source
code become free range or would the rights be transferred to another
company?
* How much does it cost to purchase viewing rights to the code? Does
Microsoft give away this right for free to larger customers?
Thanks in advance. =20
--=20
Voltage Spike
,,,
(. .)
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--
--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/FXdbpNoctRtUIRQRArYAAJ9wEOI8cBu9sY0rs7uUWZfmKqSZCQCfcsDr
0CmSNWhqeaNdwD8IQO7Stio=
=k4YD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK--
(text/plain)