Am 02. Jul, 2003 schw=E4tzte Mike Starke so:
> I am just curious; why would cox block inbound 25 & 80,
> but not ftp(21)?
>
> Certainly ftp has the potential for hogging bandwidth,
> not 25. I know 25 had some spam implications, but hell there
> is software to govern folks that are out of hand there...but why
> leave ftp open?
Not just 25, but also 465, smtps. I wonder if this is part of the unpatriot
act similar to the FBI port that Cisco is building into new products.
ciao,
der.hans
--=20
# https://www.LuftHans.com/ http://www.AZOTO.org/
# Practice socially consious hedonism. Do whatever you want,
# as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else. - der.hans
(text/plain)