Author: David A. Sinck Date: Subject: Tired of Being Screwed By Cox (no pun intended)
\_ SMTP quoth der.hans on 6/17/2003 16:15 as having spake thusly:
\_
\_ Am 17. Jun, 2003 schw?,bd?(Btzte Kurt Granroth so:
\_
\_ > Far from ludicrous, I think this is a great idea. Their explanation is
\_ > dead-on for why something like this is necessary. This should cut down on
\_ > outgoing SPAM and virii quite a bit.
\_
\_ Do their smtp servers require email addresses to be *@cox.net or whatever
\_ they give out?
Their faq says vanity emails supported so long as it resolves.