mysql vs. postgresql

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
M\Tom Achtenberg at <-
MMDerek Neighbors at ->
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Trent Shipley
Date:  
Subject: mysql vs. postgresql
I thought VFP was built over the JET database engine just like Access?

How is VFP an upgrade from Access?

On Sunday 2003-06-15 07:01, Tom Achtenberg wrote:
> You are wrong about MS not having a mid range database. Visual FoxPro is
> alive and well and fills this market very well. It has most of the
> features the top level databases have. VFP 8 is about to be released.


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Plug Discuss
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-ODBC for OpenOffice.org (was Re: mysql vs. postgresql)mysql vs. postgresql->
Some Mailing List Archive administrated by UnconfiguredLurker (version 2.3)