CPU Speeds and Fry's E (OT)

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: George Gambill
Date:  
Subject: CPU Speeds and Fry's E (OT)
Logan,

Good call. Setting the "CPU Speed" to 133/133 worked. It now sees the CPU
as an Athlon 2200.
Knoppix now says it is running at 1792 MHz (1.792 GHz) which is close enough
to 1.8 GHz for me.

BTW, setting the "CPU Speed" to 166/133 was not fun. I had to do the Clear
CMOS thing. I had to try.

Thanks.

George Wayne Gambill ... Registered Linux User: #311028


-------- Origional Message -------
From: Voltage Spike <>
Subject: Re: CPU Speeds and Fry's E (OT)

On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:45:43AM -0700, George Gambill wrote:

> I was wanting to build a new LTSP server so last week, I bought an AMD
> Athlon XP 2200 (and MoBo) from Fry's Electronic. The Athlon XP 2200 is
> supposed to run at 1.8 GHz. However, while booting, the system shows the
> CPU to be an Athlon 1500+. Further, (booting under Knoppix) the Knoppix

CD
> shows it running (while booting) at 1344 MHz (1.344 GHz).
>
> The MoBo somehow identifies the CPU and sets the clock rate accordingly.
>
> Looking at the Setup Utility (CTRL + DEL while booting), in the "CPU PnP
> Setup" section, everything is grayed out (including CPU Frequency) except
> "CPU Speed". The default CPU speed is 100/100.MHz. Other options are
> 100/133, 133/133 and 166/133. Could these have any bearing on the 1500+
> issue?


Yes! Do not fault Fry's Electronics or the motherboard manufacturer.

Essentially, the motherboard supports both XP and non-XP versions of the
processor. You may safely(1) "transform" your Athlon 1500+ processor into
an Athlon XP 2200, change the "CPU Speed" setting. I am fairly sure
that the proper setting is "133/133" and that "166/133" is an
overclocking option, but I have a slower processor.

(1) I say safely because you really do have the XP version of the
    processor which has been rated at a certain level.  My guess is that
    a normal Athlon 1500+ may be clocked up to an Athlon XP 2200, but it
    would exceed the original processor specifications.


PS: I am not sure if the situation is similar with the P4. I have very
little experience with them.

-- 
                                                          Logan Kennelly
      ,,,
     (. .)
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--


--__--__--